Platform
Enterprise & Operational Risk

Disaster Recovery

Recovery plans, objectives and tested readiness for systems

Document technology recovery plans with recovery-time and recovery-point objectives, link them to the critical services they support, and record recovery testing — so the organisation can restore systems within agreed tolerances and evidence it. OnyxOne Disaster Recovery gives IT and resilience teams one place where every recovery plan, its RTO and RPO, its dependencies and its last successful test are current, connected and provable, rather than scattered across runbooks and wikis of unknown vintage.

At a glance

How it works, visually

Risk assessment at a glanceIllustrative
51015202548121620369121524681012345Likelihood54321Impact12345LowModerateElevatedHighCritical

An illustrative 5×5 likelihood × impact heatmap — the kind of view risk teams work from. Values are an example.

The challenge

The problems this module solves

The operational realities that make this hard for compliance and risk teams today.

Recovery plans are out of date the day they're filed

Runbooks are written against an architecture that keeps changing. Systems are migrated, re-platformed and retired, but the recovery documentation isn't updated, so the plan the team would reach for in an outage describes an environment that no longer exists.

RTO and RPO are aspirations, not commitments

Recovery-time and recovery-point objectives are set in a policy but never validated against reality. Nobody knows whether a given system can actually be restored within its RTO or how much data would truly be lost, so the objectives are numbers on a page rather than tested commitments.

Recovery isn't linked to business impact

IT recovers systems in whatever order seems sensible, disconnected from which business services depend on them. Effort goes into restoring a low-impact system while a critical service waits, because the link between technology and business criticality was never mapped.

Testing is infrequent and poorly evidenced

DR tests are rare, disruptive and lightly documented. When they do happen, the results — what recovered, how long it took, what failed — aren't captured in a way that proves the objective was met or drives the gaps to closure.

Nobody can prove recoverability on request

Auditors, boards and regulators increasingly ask for evidence that critical systems can be recovered within tolerance. Assembling proof — current plans, objectives, last test dates and results — from scattered sources is slow, and the gaps only become visible under the deadline.

The approach

How OnyxOne addresses it

A single register of recovery plans

Every technology recovery plan lives in one register with its scope, owner, procedure, dependencies and current version. There is one authoritative plan per system, kept current and versioned, rather than competing runbooks of uncertain age spread across wikis and drives.

RTO and RPO set, linked and tested

Each system carries its recovery-time and recovery-point objectives, linked to the criticality of the business services it supports. Tests measure actual recovery time and data loss against those objectives, so RTO and RPO become validated commitments rather than untested aspirations.

Recovery prioritised by business impact

Recovery plans link to the critical business services they underpin, so recovery sequence follows business impact and impact tolerances. Technology is restored in the order the business actually needs, not in whatever order seems convenient in the moment.

Structured recovery testing with recorded results

Schedule and run recovery tests against defined scenarios, capturing actual recovery time, data-loss point, what failed and the remediation. Every test produces durable evidence and a set of actions, so objectives are proven and gaps are driven to closure rather than forgotten.

Recoverability evidence on demand

Because plans, objectives, dependencies and test history live in one connected model, the firm can show — per system and per critical service — that recovery is planned, resourced and tested within tolerance, turning an audit request into a report rather than a project.

Capabilities

What's in the module

Turn on what you need and add more as your programme scales.

Recovery plan register

One authoritative, versioned recovery plan per system, with scope, procedure, owner and dependencies.

RTO & RPO objectives

Set recovery-time and recovery-point objectives per system, linked to the criticality of the services they support.

Service & dependency linkage

Map recovery plans to the critical business services and infrastructure they underpin so recovery follows business impact.

Recovery testing

Schedule, run and record recovery tests against defined scenarios, measuring actual time and data loss.

Objective validation

Compare tested recovery against RTO/RPO to show whether objectives are actually being met.

Recovery sequencing

Order recovery by business criticality and dependency so the right systems come back in the right order.

Runbook & procedure detail

Hold step-by-step recovery procedures, roles and contacts so plans can be executed under pressure.

Findings & remediation

Capture test failures and gaps as tracked actions with owners and target dates.

Configuration & asset linkage

Keep plans aligned to the systems they cover by linking to your asset and configuration sources.

Immutable test history

Every plan version and test result is preserved as durable recoverability evidence.

Dashboards

The views your team works from

Purpose-built dashboards and views, each answering a question a specific role needs to act on.

An executive viewIllustrative
ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLEOPEN CASES128SLA ADHERENCE96%SCREENING ALERTS1.2kOVERDUE REVIEWS14Cases by categoryAMLKYCFraudSanctionsConductOtherRisk mixby tierHighMediumLow

A representative layout of the KPI tiles and charts these dashboards present. Figures shown are illustrative examples, not real data.

Recovery plan register

Every recovery plan with owner, scope, version and the systems and services it covers, filterable across the estate.

RTO/RPO posture

Objectives by system against last tested results, showing where recovery is proven within tolerance and where it is not.

Test results board

Recovery tests with actual recovery time and data-loss point versus objective, plus findings raised.

Recovery sequence view

Systems ordered by the business impact of the services they support, so recovery priority is clear before an event.

Remediation tracker

Open remediation actions from test shortfalls and failures, by owner and due date, tracked to closure.

Automation

What the platform automates

Rules, workflows, alerts and scheduling that run the routine so your team works the exceptions.

Test scheduling & reminders

Recovery tests are scheduled on cadence and owners reminded, so testing happens on time rather than when it is remembered.

Objective-breach flagging

When a test's measured recovery time or data loss exceeds the system's RTO or RPO, the shortfall is flagged and a remediation task raised.

Plan-review scheduling

Recovery plans enter their review cycle automatically and owners are prompted before a review falls due.

Change-triggered plan flags

When a linked asset or dependency changes, the affected recovery plan is flagged for update automatically.

Remediation follow-up

Actions from test failures are reminded before they fall due and escalated when they slip past target.

AI assistance

Where AI helps the analyst

Assistive, decision-support features that speed up the work on the record. Suggestions are always reviewable, and a person stays in control of every decision.

Runbook drafting

Drafts recovery-procedure steps from a system's documented dependencies and prior plans, which the plan owner reviews, tests and owns before use.

Objective-consistency checking

Flags recovery objectives that look inconsistent with the criticality of the services they support, prompting a person to reconcile them.

Test-result summarisation

Summarises recovery-test outcomes into proposed findings and remediation actions, leaving validation and prioritisation to the team.

The workflow

The enterprise workflow

A defined, end-to-end process with clear ownership at every stage.

The workflow, step by stepSchematic
01Register systems & plansDocument a recovery plan for each in-scope system, with its procedure, owner anddependencies, in one authoritative register.02Set RTO & RPOAssign recovery-time and recovery-point objectives to each system, aligned to thecriticality of the business services it supports.03Map to servicesLink recovery plans to the critical business services and infrastructure theyunderpin so recovery sequence follows business impact.04Test recoveryRun recovery tests against defined scenarios, measuring actual recovery time anddata-loss point and recording what failed.05Validate & remediateCompare results to RTO/RPO, and turn shortfalls and failures into trackedremediation actions with owners and dates.06Evidence recoverabilityReport recovery objectives, dependencies and tested results per system and serviceto leadership, audit and regulators.

Every result, decision and override is captured against the record it belongs to.

01

Register systems & plans

Document a recovery plan for each in-scope system, with its procedure, owner and dependencies, in one authoritative register.

02

Set RTO & RPO

Assign recovery-time and recovery-point objectives to each system, aligned to the criticality of the business services it supports.

03

Map to services

Link recovery plans to the critical business services and infrastructure they underpin so recovery sequence follows business impact.

04

Test recovery

Run recovery tests against defined scenarios, measuring actual recovery time and data-loss point and recording what failed.

05

Validate & remediate

Compare results to RTO/RPO, and turn shortfalls and failures into tracked remediation actions with owners and dates.

06

Evidence recoverability

Report recovery objectives, dependencies and tested results per system and service to leadership, audit and regulators.

The value

What your team gains

Authoritative

One plan per system, kept current

A single versioned register replaces competing runbooks, so the plan the team reaches for in an outage is the right one.

Tested

RTO and RPO you can actually meet

Objectives validated by real recovery tests become commitments backed by evidence rather than numbers in a policy.

Prioritised

Recovery in business-impact order

Linking plans to critical services means systems come back in the order the business needs, not the order that seems convenient.

Evidenced

Proof of recoverability on demand

Plans, objectives and test history in one model turn 'prove you can recover' from a scramble into a report.

Gaps driven to closure

Test failures become tracked remediation actions, so shortfalls are fixed rather than rediscovered at the next test.

Confident, sequenced response

Current runbooks, mapped dependencies and known objectives let teams execute recovery calmly instead of improvising under pressure.

Built for

Industries it serves

Financial ServicesBankingInsuranceInvestment FirmsFintechPayments & Market InfrastructureTechnology & SaaSRegulated EnterprisesHealthcare
Integrations

Works with your existing systems

Described as capabilities — OnyxOne connects to the systems your deployment requires, configured per implementation.

Business continuity
  • Links technology recovery plans and RTO/RPO to the critical services and impact tolerances held in the business-continuity module
Asset & configuration sources
  • Ingests system, application and infrastructure inventory from your existing CMDB and asset tools to keep plans aligned to reality
Incident & operational risk
  • Connects to incident management and operational risk so real outages inform recovery planning and objectives
Monitoring & ITSM
  • Works alongside your existing monitoring and IT service-management tooling to trigger and track recovery activity
Collaboration & notification
  • Routes test tasks, plan-review reminders and remediation actions through your existing email and messaging channels
Assurance

Security, compliance & reporting

Security & data handling

  • Recovery plans, runbooks and test results are encrypted in transit and at rest, with access governed by role-based permissions.
  • Sensitive recovery procedure and infrastructure detail can be restricted to named technology and oversight roles.
  • Every plan version and recovery-test result is written to an append-only audit trail.
  • Recovery roles and contacts are access-controlled and kept current alongside the identity directory.
  • Retention of recovery plans and test evidence is configurable to your regulatory and record-keeping obligations.

Compliance support

  • Supports operational-resilience expectations for recovery of important business services within tolerance
  • Aligns with recognised continuity and IT-resilience practice such as ISO 22301 and ISO 27031
  • Provides tested-recovery evidence expected in regulatory examination and audit
  • Underpins the technology-recovery layer of a documented operational-resilience programme
  • Supplies documented RTO/RPO and test evidence for internal audit and supervisory review

Reports & exports

  • Recovery plan register with owners, scope and version
  • RTO/RPO objectives by system and by supported service
  • Recovery-test schedule, results and objective-attainment reports
  • Objective-shortfall and single-point-of-failure reports
  • Remediation-action status and overdue-action reports
  • Per-service recoverability evidence packs
Best practice

How to get the most from it

Derive objectives from business impact

Set RTO and RPO from the criticality of the services a system supports, not from IT convenience. Objectives that ignore business impact recover the wrong things first.

Test to the objective, not around it

Measure actual recovery time and data loss against the stated RTO and RPO. A test that doesn't measure against the objective proves nothing about whether you'll meet it.

Keep plans aligned to the estate

Link recovery plans to your asset and configuration sources so they move as the architecture moves. A plan for a system that has since changed is a liability in an outage.

Close every test finding

Turn shortfalls and failures into tracked remediation. Testing that surfaces gaps but doesn't fix them just documents the same problem twice.

FAQ

Questions, answered

How are RTO and RPO handled?

Each system carries recovery-time and recovery-point objectives linked to the criticality of the services it supports. Recovery tests measure actual recovery time and data-loss point against those objectives, so RTO and RPO become validated commitments rather than untested numbers in a policy.

How does recovery follow business priority?

Recovery plans link to the critical business services they underpin, so recovery sequence follows business impact and impact tolerances. Systems are restored in the order the business needs rather than in an arbitrary technical order.

How is recovery testing recorded?

You schedule and run recovery tests against defined scenarios, capturing actual recovery time, the data-loss point, what failed and the remediation. Every test produces durable evidence and a set of tracked actions, so objectives are proven and gaps are driven to closure.

How does this relate to business continuity?

Disaster recovery covers restoring the underlying technology; business continuity covers keeping critical business services running. The modules link, so technology recovery plans and their RTO/RPO connect to the critical services and impact tolerances they support for one resilience picture.

Can we prove recoverability to a regulator?

Yes. Plans, objectives, dependencies and test history live in one connected model, so per system and per critical service you can show that recovery is planned, resourced and tested within tolerance — producing evidence on request rather than assembling it under a deadline.

See Disaster Recovery in your programme

Book a walkthrough and we'll show how this module fits your policy, workflows and obligations — then scope an implementation.